You may have heard that Marylin Monroe used to wear a size that is today standard XL or even XXL. And then you look at the photos of the petite woman and ask yourself how that was possible. Her US size was 16 and if you only look at it from today's perspective, that would indeed be XXL. But in her times, 16 was closer to what today's S size is, equivalent of modern US size 4 or 6.
How?
Sizes have gone through many changes in the past, and I am quite sure, those weren't the last. You may have heard the term 'vanity sizing' which refers to the constantly shrinking size numbers. With no diet and effort you can suddenly fit into clothes one size smaller. Just to make the buyers happy and feel good enough about themselves to buy more. The magic was to change the number on the label to a smaller one, while the actual garment size in cm or inches was the same. Look how the small size evolved over the past few decades:
| US Size | EU Size | bust | waist | hips | what happened | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 12–14 | 38–40 | 34–36 in 86–91 cm | 26–28 in 66–71 cm | 36–38 in 91–97 cm | Structured fit, little ease |
| 1960s | 10–12 | 38 | 34–35.5 in 86–90 cm | 26–27.5 in 66–70 cm | 36–37.5 in 91–96 cm | Slight shift begins |
| 1970s | 8–10 | 36–38 | 34–35.5 in 86–90 cm | 26.5–28 in 67–71 cm | 36–38 in 92–97 cm | Early vanity sizing |
| 1980s | 8 | 36–38 | 34.5–36 in 87–91 cm | 27–28.5 in 68–72 cm | 36.5–38.5 in 93–98 cm | More ease in garments |
| 1990s | 6–8 | 36 | 34.5–36 in 87–91 cm | 27–28.5 in 68–72 cm | 36.5–38.5 in 93–98 cm | Vanity sizing accelerates |
| 2000s | 6 | 34–36 | 34.5–36 in 88–92 cm | 27–28.5 in 68–72 cm | 37–39 in 94–99 cm | Modern standard, stretch fabric |
| 2010s–2020s | 4–6 | 34–36 | 34.5–36 in 88–92 cm | 26.5–28.5 in 68–72 cm | 37–39 in 94–99 cm | Sizes shrink further |
So the key, you may think, is in the measurements, right? I also thought so. And bought a bunch of cute vintage patterns on Etsy...
Unless your body type is closer to a pear, that should do it for the whole pattern. And adjusting the garment around your waist and hips should be way easier. One more thing to take into account: vintage patterns are way more cinched at the waist than any modern style. With or without a corset - that was the beauty standard. Even with a perfect hourglass figure you may need to make a few adjustments.
2. Always make a mock up before cutting from the final fabric. I know, this is tedious, and you may think: what if it is so nice I want to wear the mock up? Well, do wear it. But make it from a cheaper fabric, one that you would not be disappointed to discard if things do not go well.
3. Another good tip I can share is to measure your half-body: bust and then back. Divide by two, and add 1-2 cm for ease. Then compare with the bodice pattern piece. This should give you a good idea of how the garment is going to fit before even making the mock up.
![]() |
| Measure your half body: seam to seam |
4. Finally, even if your measurements match the ones on the envelope, you may still feel that something is off. I encourage you to try a smaller or larger size. You may find that they are a much better fit. I went for one smaller as an experiment, and everything started to fit so much better. I did have to adjust a waistline or other, but overall, it was an unexpected improvement.
I hope you find this article helpful when choosing your next sewing project.



No comments:
Post a Comment